News

A contracting crew in northern Scandinavia ran a Metso C125 on high-silica granite that chewed through a standard 18Mn jaw plate in only 900 operating hours. The plant lost a full shift at every change-out, so the buyer looked at premium options. He switched one chamber to a titanium carbide inserted jaw plate and doubled the service life, but the unit price was 60 percent higher than the standard plate. The real question was never “which plate is better” but when does the extra metallurgy actually pay back.

How a TIC-Inserted Jaw Plate Is Built

A TIC, or titanium carbide, inserted plate is not a different metal from top to bottom. The base matrix is still austenitic high manganese steel, the same 18Mn grade used in a standard plate. The difference is that hard ceramic or carbide columns are cast into the working wear face, where the rock actually slides and bites. Those inserts carry a hardness far above the manganese matrix, so the wear surface resists abrasion while the tough base absorbs impact. The result is a plate that wears slowly where it matters most, yet still survives the shock load of the chamber.

Which Rock Makes the Upgrade Worth It

The premium plate only earns its price when the feed is genuinely abrasive. The right conditions are high abrasiveness, high SiO2 content, high compressive strength, and dry crushing. Granite, quartzite, and hard river gravel with a high silica fraction are the classic cases. Under these feeds, the standard plate dies young while the inserted plate keeps cutting.

High SiO2 content: the inserts blunt the cutting action of free quartz.
High compressive strength: hard rock that does not deform under load.
Dry crushing: water and slurry accelerate matrix wear, so dry feeds favor inserts.

For the Metso C125 and LT125 platforms, the 18Mn jaw plate with TIC insert for the C125 and LT125 is the direct upgrade path.

Where the Insert Plate Loses Money

The same metallurgy can be a poor choice on the wrong feed. Sticky, muddy rock clogs the chamber and the inserts never reach their abrasive partner. On feeds with extreme impact load, the brittle carbide columns can spall and break out, leaving the plate worse than standard. Closed-circuit plants with a high proportion of recirculated fine material also wear the matrix between inserts faster than the inserts can help. When the rock is soft, wet, or low in silica, the standard 18Mn jaw plate for the same C125 and LT125 models is the smarter spend.

The Cost-per-Ton Calculation That Settles the Debate

Do not compare sticker prices; compare cost per processed ton. The formula is simple: cost per ton equals unit price divided by total tons processed before change-out. A standard plate at 100 dollars that lasts 900 hours at 200 tons per hour processes 180,000 tons, a wear cost near 0.00056 dollars per ton. A TIC plate at 160 dollars that lasts 1,800 hours processes 360,000 tons, a cost near 0.00044 dollars per ton. The insert wins on paper, but only if you also count the saved change-out shifts: every doubled interval removes one crane, one crew, and one lost-production window. On a tight plant, that downtime saving can outweigh the material saving.

Hard Limits You Must Respect

An inserted plate is not a standard plate with extra life. It carries two hard limits that standard plates do not. First, the carbide face cannot be machined and cannot be rebuilt by build-up welding, so a worn insert plate is scrapped, not repaired. Second, the inserts are directional: the plate must be installed with the insert face oriented exactly as drawn, never reversed, or the carbide will sit in the wrong zone and spall. Always match the inserted plate to its opposing fixed or swing jaw plate so the two faces wear as a pair.

Inventory and Capital Occupation

Because the unit price is higher, the inserted plate ties up more working capital per unit on the shelf. The rule for dealers and fleets is clear: stock inserted plates only for the machines that genuinely run abrasive feed, and keep standard plates as the default buffer. Do not blanket the warehouse with premium grade just in case, or cash sits idle while cheaper plates would have served.

For other jaw platforms, the J45 and J50 swing and fixed jaw plates cover the mid-size range.

The high manganese steel fixed and swing jaw plate is the standard-matrix option for general duty.

For stone crushing lines, the stone jaw crusher casting wear parts in fixed and swing design complete the range.

Decision Table: Worth It or Not

Use compressive strength and SiO2 to decide fast. The field rule below is not a laboratory verdict.

Compressive strength above 200 MPa and SiO2 above 60 percent: choose the TIC insert.
Compressive strength below 120 MPa or SiO2 below 30 percent: choose standard 18Mn.
Between the two bands: run a side-by-side trial on one chamber first.

Five On-Site Parameters to Send With Every Quote

A correct quote needs facts, not guesses. Provide these five field parameters:

Crusher model and cavity: exact model, for example C125, and the liner profile.
Feed rock type: name the stone and its source pit.
SiO2 and compressive strength: from a recent test if available.
Throughput per hour: tons per hour and operating shift pattern.
Current plate life in hours: what the standard plate achieves today.

The conclusion is direct: a titanium carbide insert is a tool for a specific rock, not a universal upgrade. Run the cost-per-ton math, respect the no-weld and no-reverse limits, stock it only where the feed earns it, and the premium metallurgy will pay back instead of merely costing more.

Post time: Oct-23-2026